Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e6, 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-768257

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of using a dishwasher or different chemical agents, including 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), a mouthrinse containing essential oils and alcohol, and 50% white vinegar, for toothbrush disinfection. Sixty volunteers were divided into five experimental groups and one control group (n = 10). Participants brushed their teeth using toothbrushes with standard bristles, and they disinfected the toothbrushes according to instructed methods. Bacterial contamination of the toothbrushes was compared between the experimental groups and the control group. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Duncan's multiple range tests, with 95% confidence intervals for multiple comparisons. Bacterial contamination of toothbrushes from individuals in the experimental groups differed from those in the control group (p < 0.05). The most effective method for elimination of all tested bacterial species was 50% white vinegar, followed in order by 2% NaOCl, mouthrinse containing essential oils and alcohol, 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, dishwasher use, and tap water (control). The results of this study show that the most effective method for disinfecting toothbrushes was submersion in 50% white vinegar, which is cost-effective, easy to access, and appropriate for household use.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Devices, Home Care/microbiology , Disinfection/methods , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Acetic Acid/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Colony Count, Microbial , Chlorhexidine/chemistry , Dental Disinfectants/chemistry , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Immersion , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus/drug effects , Statistics, Nonparametric , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Time Factors
2.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-8, 2015. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-777222

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and behavior of dentists regarding toothbrush disinfection. This study included 147 dentists (88 women and 59 men) who were actively employed at a dental school in Ankara, Turkey. Participants were asked to fill out a standard questionnaire, which contained questions regarding their demographics, brushing habits, toothbrush storage and disinfection habits, toothpaste use, knowledge about toothbrush disinfection, and whether they advised their patients about toothbrush storage. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and statistical analyses were performed with t-tests, chi-squared tests, and Fisher exact tests, where appropriate. Among the 147 surveyed dentists, 62.6% and 85.7% reported that they did not have any knowledge about toothbrush disinfection and did not disinfect their toothbrushes, respectively. However, approximately two thirds of surveyed dentists thought that toothbrush disinfection should be performed by everyone, including healthy individuals. Significant associations were found between knowledge about toothbrush disinfection and the professional title of dentists, how they stored their toothbrushes, and whether their toothbrushes were in contact with each other during storage (p < 0.05). A minority of dentists reported that they disinfected their toothbrushes.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Dental Devices, Home Care/microbiology , Disinfection/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/statistics & numerical data , Schools, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Dentists/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Toothbrushing , Turkey
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL